sakib.ninja sakib.ninja

AWS Outage: Lessons on High Availability and Multi-Cloud Strategy

On October 20, 2025, a DNS issue in AWS US-EAST-1 caused a significant outage that rippled across the internet. Services relying on this region, including APIs, SaaS platforms, and consumer apps faced downtime, reminding us how a single regional failure in a hyperscale cloud can impact millions of users.

This incident highlights the importance of resilience planning, multi-AZ architectures, and multi-cloud deployments to reduce systemic risk.

Why It Matters

Cloud outages are rare but inevitable.
Even with AWS’s world-class infrastructure, US-EAST-1 has historically been a single point of failure for many companies that rely on it exclusively.

Key lessons:

  • Multi-AZ deployment isn’t enough: if all traffic is pinned to a single AWS region.
  • DNS failures are cascading: if resolution breaks, apps can’t connect to healthy services.
  • Vendor lock-in is a risk: if your stack is tightly coupled to one provider, you’re exposed to their failures.

High Availability (Multi-AZ)

Within AWS, Availability Zones (AZs) are designed to isolate failures. A well-architected service should:

  • Deploy workloads across at least 3 AZs in a region.
  • Use Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) or Application Load Balancer (ALB) to route across AZs.
  • Enable RDS Multi-AZ replication or Aurora cluster replication.
  • Ensure stateless compute (ECS/EKS/EC2) so workloads fail over seamlessly.

⚠️ However, during a regional service (DNS) outage, multi-AZ deployments are not sufficient, because the failure is systemic to the entire region.

Multi-Region Resilience

To survive regional outages:

  • Active-Active Multi-Region: run workloads simultaneously in multiple AWS regions (e.g., US-EAST-1 + US-WEST-2).
  • Active-Passive Failover: keep a secondary region warm, switch traffic using Route 53 health checks or global load balancers.
  • Data Replication: use services like DynamoDB Global Tables, Aurora Global Database, or S3 Cross-Region Replication.

📌 Best practice: Treat multi-region as mandatory if downtime directly impacts revenue.

Multi-Cloud Strategy

For critical businesses, multi-cloud can be a safeguard against provider-wide risks:

  • Cloud-agnostic orchestration: use Kubernetes or Terraform to deploy across AWS, GCP, and Azure.
  • DNS abstraction: leverage providers like Cloudflare or Akamai instead of relying solely on AWS Route 53.
  • Cross-cloud storage & compute: replicate data to GCP/Azure while running active workloads in AWS.
  • Service selection: avoid deep lock-in with cloud-native PaaS (like DynamoDB or BigTable) if resilience is the priority.

⚠️ Trade-off: Multi-cloud increases operational complexity and cost. It’s best suited for businesses where downtime = millions lost.

Example Architectures

Multi-AZ (High Availability inside one AWS region)

Takeaway: Great against AZ failures, but regional/control-plane issues (e.g., DNS) can still take you out.

Multi-Region Active-Active (survives a regional event)

Notes

  • Prefer DynamoDB Global Tables for true active-active writes with built-in conflict resolution.
  • If using Aurora Global, treat one region as writer and others as readers (or carefully manage write forwarding).

Multi-Cloud (Provider resilience) with shared control plane patterns

Design cues

  • Control plane abstraction: Kubernetes + Terraform + Vault unify provisioning/secrets.
  • Authentication: one IdP across clouds.
  • Data: replicate via CDC (Debezium) or Kafka MirrorMaker 2; object storage via batch sync.
  • Start read-mostly in secondary clouds, then graduate to active-active where conflict-free.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  1. Single-Region Dependency: treating one AWS region as “always up.”
  2. DNS Blind Spot: ignoring DNS redundancy and caching strategies.
  3. Deep Vendor Lock-In: making it impossible to run workloads elsewhere.
  4. Underestimating Cost of Downtime: saving on infra but losing millions during outages.

Final Thoughts

The AWS US-EAST-1 outage was another reminder that resilience is not optional.
Multi-AZ helps against localized failures, but only multi-region or multi-cloud truly protects against systemic ones.

To future-proof your architecture:

  • Always deploy across multiple AZs.
  • Consider multi-region if availability is business-critical.
  • Adopt multi-cloud if downtime costs outweigh complexity.

Outages will happen. Resilience is a design choice.

No previous